
- Pdfpen pro 9 vs. 8 manuals#
- Pdfpen pro 9 vs. 8 pdf#
- Pdfpen pro 9 vs. 8 pro#
- Pdfpen pro 9 vs. 8 software#
- Pdfpen pro 9 vs. 8 mac#
Smile will continue offering TextExpander, a utility that I described as “ autocorrect on steroids.” Not being a massive fan of subscription software, however, I’ve since switched to using PhraseExpress, which has a one-off fee that sees you break even in 15 months, at the cost of a rather Windows-like UI. The acquisition will be funded from the Company’s existing cash reserves. Under the terms of the acquisition, Nitro will acquire the PDFpen technology from US-based Smile, Inc. Nitro customers now have productivity solutions for virtually every device and operating system - at home, in the office, in the field and on the move.
Pdfpen pro 9 vs. 8 mac#
The expansion of Nitro’s Productivity Platform comes at a critical time for customers, with the work-from-anywhere tailwinds driven by the COVID-19 pandemic accelerating digital transformation, including the use of Mac and mobile devices.
Pdfpen pro 9 vs. 8 pdf#
The addition of PDFpen extends native PDF productivity to Mac, iPhone and iPad users everywhere.
Pdfpen pro 9 vs. 8 pro#
Nitro’s Productivity Platform already supports certain key mobile and tablet use cases, with eSigning available on any device with a web browser and Nitro Pro compatible with Microsoft Surface devices.
Pdfpen pro 9 vs. 8 software#
Nitro Software Limited (ASX: NTO) (‘Nitro’ or the ‘Company’), a global document productivity software company driving digital transformation in organisations around the world, is pleased to announce the acquisition of PDFpen, a market-leading suite of PDF productivity applications for Mac, iPhone® and iPad® The linked announcement does suggest 6 million possible reasons, however. Here is a link to Nitro’s blog announcement. We at Smile believe Nitro is well placed to take the PDFpen product to the next level. We are excited to announce the acquisition of PDFpen by Nitro. Smile doesn’t offer any explanation for the sale of the app in its three-sentence announcement. PDFpen developer Smile is retaining ownership of popular Mac macro app TextExpander … It is good enough as a PDF editor that it can replace both Apple Preview and Adobe Acrobat.Ĭomments and your own experiences are welcome.Mac, iPad, and iPhone PDF editing app PDFpen has been sold to Nitro, a company that offers Windows and browser-based PDF editors.

If I really wanted a dedicated OCR program, Finereader is probably the way to go. I am not attempting a comprehensive review or comparison here.

PDFpen has OCR as an afterthought, and seems to have no controls except selecting your language. Finereader may have an on/off switch for compression, but I’ve never investigated in detail. Or, you can set it so there is no compression at all. You can shrink documents another factor of 2 if you settle for slightly blurred text. Acrobat is in the middle.Īs a side note, Acrobat has a number of settings for compression. A single page of a very detailed graph can take 2 minutes, and I’ve needed to run some 700 page documents overnight. Finereader can be very very slow, especially when it runs into figures that it “thinks” might actually be text. In terms of speed, PDFpen is the fastest.

(OCR = Optical Character Recognition = takes scanned documents and makes them searchable, copyable, etc.) Here are some notes on my experience, with the goal of saving time for others in the future. In the end, no single OCR program did everything, and I have ended up with 3. I have them all in a database, and it’s useful to search the DB for key terms like V1 and density altitude.
Pdfpen pro 9 vs. 8 manuals#
I have been doing a lot of OCR, as I study more than 100 old aircraft manuals to see how aviation procedures evolved.
